Monthly Archives: December 2011

Watch what you post on your wall

Anything that you post online can come back to bite you in the backside.

Jennifer O’Brien, a first-grade teacher in New Jersey, Paterson, got into trouble when she wrote on her Facebook wall: “I’m not a teacher – I’m a warden for future criminals!” The teacher posted this after she was hit by her first graders and others stole money from her.

Paterson has a crime index of 16 (the safest is 100), and is not really known for its peaceful neighborhood. Imagine tiny little 3 feet something tall kids hitting you and stealing your money?

With people using their Facebook wall to talk about anything, from how consistent their bowel movements are to how they are dealing with their break-ups, it is no surprise that Jennifer thought nothing of posting her thoughts on her wall.

What you must know is that the post was meant only for her 300 odd friends, but because it was shared by them on their walls, it got out and was read by many people outside her friends circle. The local community was incensed that she dared call their law-abiding citizens future criminals. Gasp! The judge has recommended that Jennifer lose her tenured position.

This incident highlights many issues. When are parents going to grow up and take responsibility for their children’s actions than go up in arms against anyone who dares point out the obvious? How does the personal opinion of a first-grade teacher nobody even knows about, even matter? Is there anything that even remotely resembles privacy when it comes to internet and the social media? Is it against the law to hurt someone’s feelings?

With the kind of ruckus that we see back home and even in the United States where there is such a thing as the First Amendment, I am wondering if being an active participant in social media is a wise thing to do. Once you post something online, it is permanent. And you cannot control who sees what, even if you had shared it among a limited audience to start with.

If you are not making a fool of yourself by posting shit-faced pictures of you and the gang, others are waiting for an opportunity to make an example of you and further their cause.

What a scary online world. And to think that I hoped it would be better than the real one.

 

 

If you were to write my life story it would be a best seller

I’m hearing this for the second time in the last seven days.

“So many strange things have happened in my life, you wouldn’t believe it if I told you.”

You think? Try me.

It may be difficult for most people to accept this, but here is the truth: your life is no more special than that of the average Jill or Joe.

How many times have you watched a movie or read a novel and identified yourself with the protagonist? Remember all the songs that you so related to, because they were different, and so you? Guess what, they were so me too.

Your thoughts, feelings and life events are just repetitions of what transpired in the lives of millions before you, happening in the lives of millions around you, and will be replicated in the lives of millions after you.

Yet, we all feel that we are somehow different from the rest and that ours is the story to tell.

False uniqueness effect is a psychological bias by which individuals or groups believe that their own attitudes, beliefs and worldview are negatively correlated with those of a target population. It is the tendency to underestimate the commonality of one’s abilities and one’s desirable or successful behaviors.

This bias gives rise to inaccurate social comparisons which make you believe that what you feel is not commonly felt by others around you. Combined with pluralistic ignorance (a situation where majority of the people in a group privately reject an idea, but do not speak their mind because they think everyone else accepts it), this can lead to terribly misleading conclusions about yourself and the world in general.

Shortsighted social judgment and self-focused comparison

In 2003, Moore and Kim conducted an experiment to explore the psychological processes that people use to arrive at social assessments. A group of students were asked to wager on the probability of beating an opponent in a quiz. When the quiz was easy, students bet more, thinking they had a better chance of beating the opponent. What they did not take into consideration was that the opponents would also find the quiz easy and therefore the probability of winning essentially remains the same, regardless of the difficulty of the quiz.

The results suggest that people have a “tendency to focus myopically on a single causal agent (self) and to oversimplify the behavior of others when making comparisons.” (Parenthesis mine.)

Several other interesting cognitive biases such as false consensus, illusory superiority, self-serving bias etc. also spring into action every time you are required to assess yourself or an idea, either in isolation, or in comparison with others.

Controllability bias

People tend to overestimate their capabilities when it comes to events that they perceive they can control, or at least influence to a certain degree. This “controllability bias” is self-serving and is essential for survival. It is easy to see why it is necessary to perceive yourself as capable and sufficiently equipped to face life head on and emerge victorious. If you didn’t believe so, you are finished even before you begin.

Controllability bias is especially pronounced in people who have an internal locus of control (those who are not fatalistic or deterministic), as opposed to those who have an external locus of control and find it easier to leave things to fate.

People with an internal locus of control also have an advantage that weighs heavily in their favor; since they believe it is possible to influence the outcome of an event, they are also more likely to engage in behaviors that may result in the desired effect.

These people typically approach adverse situations with extreme confidence, unrealistic optimism, burning desire and even defiance – “I am not going to let this destroy me.”

They are aware of these qualities about themselves and know that they will push themselves on by sheer strength of their will. They know this about themselves, but don’t know whether the same is true of others, so they reasonably conclude that their position is unique. This reaffirms their controllability bias and the perception of false uniqueness.

A healthy dose of narcissism, unrealistic optimism and self-esteem bordering on overconfidence are all necessary to survive prolonged adversity. This is what leads people to believe that their life is so strange and eventful that no one may have ever experienced anything like this before, and yet here they are, alive and kicking and successful.

The smarter you are, the dumber you think you are

As egocentric creatures who are primarily focused inwards, it is difficult for us to pay attention to or acknowledge the world that exists beyond our own navels. But funnily enough, others also have similar strengths and weaknesses, they are also tormented by the same fears, motivated by the same desires, and struggle with the same kind of internal contradictions as ours.

This inward-focused thinking can also lead to negative assumptions about the self – counter-intuitively by the truly intelligent – which is explained beautifully by the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Justin Kruger and David Dunning studied the self-assessment patterns of competent and incompetent people relating to a particular skill. They found that the incompetent tend to overestimate their skills whereas the truly competent people underestimate theirs. People who are naturally skilled in certain tasks assume that it must be similarly easy for everyone else, and therefore underestimate their own competence in comparison to that of others. Also, people who are incompetent lack the meta-cognitive (knowledge about knowledge) ability to know how much they don’t know and therefore rate themselves higher.

This asymmetric and incomplete understanding of our own lives as opposed to those around us leads us to several flawed conclusions, such as the belief that we are different or are misfits or are superiorly abled and therefore entitled. It can cause you to be alienated from others because you perceive yourself to be a special being who is really not like anyone else, and therefore incapable of being understood or appreciated. Whereas, in fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

False uniqueness, especially since it is self-serving, is a tough one to deal with, but it can be done.

And then you can move on to truly frightening constructs such as the utter purposelessness of life.

 

***

 

References

Self-insight: roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. (David A. Dunning)

http://psych.colorado.edu/~vanboven/teaching/p7536_heurbias/p7536_readings/moore_kim.pdf

Hope

I seek shelter in the shadows of Tomorrow.

 

Principles of Forgiveness

Someone got in touch with me recently to offer me an apology that was past its expiry date. More shocking than this sudden intrusion into my personal space by someone whom I hadn’t even thought about in a decade, was the complete indifference that I felt to the tendering of this apology. I could not even recollect any past resentment; did that mean that I had truly forgiven this person?

Forgiveness is “a willingness to abandon one’s right to resentment, negative judgment, and indifferent behavior toward one who unjustly hurt us, while fostering the undeserved qualities of compassion, generosity and even love toward him or her.” (Enright and Coyle, 1998)

My forgiveness does not fit into the textbook definition above, because I felt a significant amount of indifference and absolutely no generosity or compassion.

So was that forgiveness or not?

Yes. Here’s why.

Forgiveness can be intrapersonal or interpersonal. Intrapersonal forgiveness is focused inwards and is about your own feelings about the past transgression. When you liberate yourself from the resentment, hatred, anger and sorrow that the other person has unjustly handed over to you, you are essentially forgiving the person though he or she may no longer be in your life. This is recommended when you are either unable to or choose not to communicate with the offender. It is the forgiver who transforms without any sort of involvement or contribution by the transgressor.

This is how abandoned children can forgive their biological parents, or how you can forgive someone who is no longer alive. But intrapersonal forgiveness has the inherent danger of self-deception – you may feel that you have forgiven the person, but the resentment still remains and the forgiveness isn’t complete yet.

Interpersonal forgiveness, on the other hand, involves extensive communication between the forgiver and the offender. You tell the person what’s bothering you, probably even fight it out and seek closure together.

For this sort of closure, perhaps the most important element is your willingness to forgive. People are fanatically possessive about their hurt, they are unwilling to let it go. What will keep you going, if not for your precious hurt and anger?

Why must you forgive?

I admit I am not someone who forgives easily, as are many of my friends who say that they will “never forgive and never forget.” A grudge is a constant reminder that people can hurt you, and therefore makes you more cautious – good for self-preservation, or so we think.

But according to this research article, it is forgiveness that has significant benefits.

The study examined the immediate emotional and physiological effects that occurred when participants (35 females, 36 males) rehearsed hurtful memories and nursed grudges (i.e., were unforgiving) compared with when they cultivated empathic perspective taking and imagined granting forgiveness (i.e., were forgiving) toward real-life offenders. Unforgiving thoughts prompted more aversive emotion, and significantly higher corrugator(brow) electromyogram (EMG), skin conductance, heart rate, and blood pressure changes from baseline. The EMG, skin conductance, and heart rate effects persisted after imagery into the recovery periods.

Forgiving thoughts prompted greater perceived control and comparatively lower physiological stress responses. The results dovetail with the psychophysiology literature and suggest possible mechanisms through which chronic unforgiving responses may erode health whereas forgiving responses may enhance it.

The way I look at it, nobody is worth wrinkles between your eyebrows and a high blood pressure. Resentment is a piece of hot coal that you carry in your hand. Don’t kid yourself, the only person who burns is you.

The forgiveness framework

The study cited above also identifies unforgiving and forgiving responses.

Unforgiving responses involve reliving the hurt over and over again, and remaining in the victim mode by holding a grudge. Physiological responses that occur during the act of transgression can be so intense that they can form anchors to the negative feelings at the time, and it becomes easy to retrieve and therefore relive them.

Forgiving responses start with the development of empathy and acknowledgment of the humanness of the offender, leading to forgiveness.

Forgiveness is not a cataclysmic epiphany that tells you that the deed is done; rather, it is a gradual fading away of the hurt till the offender and the event stop occupying your mind space. You can even consciously forgive someone by following this general forgiveness framework, fancy that!

Becoming aware of the pain –> Making a conscious decision to forgive –> Actively working on forgiveness through cognitive, emotional and behavioral responses  –> Realization of the benefits of forgiveness.

Unless you forgive, you cannot stop the cycle of hurt and pain. As long as you hurt, you will keep passing them on to those around you, those whom you love. If that is not a good enough reason to forgive, I don’t know what is.

Forgiving yourself

Sometimes, you may also need to forgive yourself. Holding a grudge against yourself is as harmful, if not more, than the resentment against someone else.

If you are seeking forgiveness and there is no way of interpersonal communication that can facilitate closure, try confession if it works for you. Kneeling before a confessional, palms joined in humility is enough to release yourself of the burden that you carry. I am doubtful if this strategy works for people with very high guilt complexes, initiated and nurtured by the same system that hands out free pardons if you would only ask.

But if you can let your god forgive you, allow yourself the luxury, because you are setting yourself free. For the rest of us, we have to struggle with setting ourselves free.

***

 

References

Enright & Coyle 1998.

Ani Kalayjian, Raymond F. Paloutzian. (2009). Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Psychological Pathways to Conflict Transformation and Peace Building.

American Psychological Society. (2001). Charlotte vanOyen Witvliet, Thomas E. Ludwig, and Kelly L. Vander Laan. GRANTING FORGIVENESS OR HARBORING GRUDGES: Implications for Emotion, Physiology, and Health.